| A practical application of switch and relay 
    logic is in control systems where several process conditions have to be met 
    before a piece of equipment is allowed to start. A good example of this is 
    burner control for large combustion furnaces. In order for the burners in a 
    large furnace to be started safely, the control system requests "permission" 
    from several process switches, including high and low fuel pressure, air fan 
    flow check, exhaust stack damper position, access door position, etc. Each 
    process condition is called a permissive, and each permissive switch 
    contact is wired in series, so that if any one of them detects an unsafe 
    condition, the circuit will be opened: 
     
     If all permissive conditions are met, CR1 
    will energize and the green lamp will be lit. In real life, more than just a 
    green lamp would be energized: usually a control relay or fuel valve 
    solenoid would be placed in that rung of the circuit to be energized when 
    all the permissive contacts were "good:" that is, all closed. If any one of 
    the permissive conditions are not met, the series string of switch contacts 
    will be broken, CR2 will de-energize, and the red lamp will 
    light.
    Note that the high fuel pressure contact is normally-closed. This is 
    because we want the switch contact to open if the fuel pressure gets too 
    high. Since the "normal" condition of any pressure switch is when zero (low) 
    pressure is being applied to it, and we want this switch to open with 
    excessive (high) pressure, we must choose a switch that is closed in its 
    normal state.  Another practical application of relay logic is in control systems where 
    we want to ensure two incompatible events cannot occur at the same time. An 
    example of this is in reversible motor control, where two motor contactors 
    are wired to switch polarity (or phase sequence) to an electric motor, and 
    we don't want the forward and reverse contactors energized simultaneously:
       
       When contactor M1 is energized, the 
    3 phases (A, B, and C) are connected directly to terminals 1, 2, and 3 of 
    the motor, respectively. However, when contactor M2 is energized, 
    phases A and B are reversed, A going to motor terminal 2 and B going to 
    motor terminal 1. This reversal of phase wires results in the motor spinning 
    the opposite direction. Let's examine the control circuit for these two 
    contactors: 
     
       Take note of the normally-closed "OL" contact, 
    which is the thermal overload contact activated by the "heater" elements 
    wired in series with each phase of the AC motor. If the heaters get too hot, 
    the contact will change from its normal (closed) state to being open, which 
    will prevent either contactor from energizing.
     This control system will work fine, so long as no one pushes both buttons 
    at the same time. If someone were to do that, phases A and B would be 
    short-circuited together by virtue of the fact that contactor M1 
    sends phases A and B straight to the motor and contactor M2 
    reverses them; phase A would be shorted to phase B and visa-versa. 
    Obviously, this is a bad control system design!  To prevent this occurrence from happening, we can design the circuit so 
    that the energization of one contactor prevents the energization of the 
    other. This is called interlocking, and it is accomplished through 
    the use of auxiliary contacts on each contactor, as such: 
     
       Now, when M1 is energized, the 
    normally-closed auxiliary contact on the second rung will be open, thus 
    preventing M2 from being energized, even if the "Reverse" 
    pushbutton is actuated. Likewise, M1's energization is prevented 
    when M2 is energized. Note, as well, how additional wire numbers 
    (4 and 5) were added to reflect the wiring changes.
    It should be noted that this is not the only way to interlock contactors 
    to prevent a short-circuit condition. Some contactors come equipped with the 
    option of a mechanical interlock: a lever joining the armatures of 
    two contactors together so that they are physically prevented from 
    simultaneous closure. For additional safety, electrical interlocks may still 
    be used, and due to the simplicity of the circuit there is no good reason 
    not to employ them in addition to mechanical interlocks.  
      REVIEW: Switch contacts installed in a rung of ladder logic designed to 
      interrupt a circuit if certain physical conditions are not met are called
      permissive contacts, because the system requires permission from 
      these inputs to activate. Switch contacts designed to prevent a control system from taking two 
      incompatible actions at once (such as powering an electric motor forward 
      and backward simultaneously) are called interlocks.  |