| Permeability and saturationThe nonlinearity of material permeability 
                    may be graphed for better understanding. We'll place the 
                    quantity of field intensity (H), equal to field force (mmf) 
                    divided by the length of the material, on the horizontal 
                    axis of the graph. On the vertical axis, we'll place the 
                    quantity of flux density (B), equal to total flux divided by 
                    the cross-sectional area of the material. We will use the 
                    quantities of field intensity (H) and flux density (B) 
                    instead of field force (mmf) and total flux (Φ) so that the 
                    shape of our graph remains independent of the physical 
                    dimensions of our test material. What we're trying to do 
                    here is show a mathematical relationship between field force 
                    and flux for any chunk of a particular substance, in 
                    the same spirit as describing a material's specific 
                    resistance in ohm-cmil/ft instead of its actual 
                    resistance in ohms.  
                      This is called the normal magnetization 
                    curve, or B-H curve, for any particular material. 
                    Notice how the flux density for any of the above materials 
                    (cast iron, cast steel, and sheet steel) levels off with 
                    increasing amounts of field intensity. This effect is known 
                    as saturation. When there is little applied magnetic 
                    force (low H), only a few atoms are in alignment, and the 
                    rest are easily aligned with additional force. However, as 
                    more flux gets crammed into the same cross-sectional area of 
                    a ferromagnetic material, fewer atoms are available within 
                    that material to align their electrons with additional 
                    force, and so it takes more and more force (H) to get less 
                    and less "help" from the material in creating more flux 
                    density (B). To put this in economic terms, we're seeing a 
                    case of diminishing returns (B) on our investment (H). 
                    Saturation is a phenomenon limited to iron-core 
                    electromagnets. Air-core electromagnets don't saturate, but 
                    on the other hand they don't produce nearly as much magnetic 
                    flux as a ferromagnetic core for the same number of wire 
                    turns and current.  Another quirk to confound our analysis of 
                    magnetic flux versus force is the phenomenon of magnetic 
                    hysteresis. As a general term, hysteresis means a lag 
                    between input and output in a system upon a change in 
                    direction. Anyone who's ever driven an old automobile with 
                    "loose" steering knows what hysteresis is: to change from 
                    turning left to turning right (or visa-versa), you have to 
                    rotate the steering wheel an additional amount to overcome 
                    the built-in "lag" in the mechanical linkage system between 
                    the steering wheel and the front wheels of the car. In a 
                    magnetic system, hysteresis is seen in a ferromagnetic 
                    material that tends to stay magnetized after an applied 
                    field force has been removed (see "retentivity" in the first 
                    section of this chapter), if the force is reversed in 
                    polarity.  Let's use the same graph again, only 
                    extending the axes to indicate both positive and negative 
                    quantities. First we'll apply an increasing field force 
                    (current through the coils of our electromagnet). We should 
                    see the flux density increase (go up and to the right) 
                    according to the normal magnetization curve:  
                      Next, we'll stop the current going through 
                    the coil of the electromagnet and see what happens to the 
                    flux, leaving the first curve still on the graph:  
                      Due to the retentivity of the material, we 
                    still have a magnetic flux with no applied force (no current 
                    through the coil). Our electromagnet core is acting as a 
                    permanent magnet at this point. Now we will slowly apply the 
                    same amount of magnetic field force in the opposite 
                    direction to our sample:  
                      The flux density has now reached a point 
                    equivalent to what it was with a full positive value of 
                    field intensity (H), except in the negative, or opposite, 
                    direction. Let's stop the current going through the coil 
                    again and see how much flux remains:  
                      Once again, due to the natural retentivity 
                    of the material, it will hold a magnetic flux with no power 
                    applied to the coil, except this time it's in a direction 
                    opposite to that of the last time we stopped current through 
                    the coil. If we re-apply power in a positive direction 
                    again, we should see the flux density reach its prior peak 
                    in the upper-right corner of the graph again:  
                      The "S"-shaped curve traced by these steps 
                    form what is called the hysteresis curve of a 
                    ferromagnetic material for a given set of field intensity 
                    extremes (-H and +H). If this doesn't quite make sense, 
                    consider a hysteresis graph for the automobile steering 
                    scenario described earlier, one graph depicting a "tight" 
                    steering system and one depicting a "loose" system:  
                        
 
 
                      Just as in the case of automobile steering 
                    systems, hysteresis can be a problem. If you're designing a 
                    system to produce precise amounts of magnetic field flux for 
                    given amounts of current, hysteresis may hinder this design 
                    goal (due to the fact that the amount of flux density would 
                    depend on the current and how strongly it was 
                    magnetized before!). Similarly, a loose steering system is 
                    unacceptable in a race car, where precise, repeatable 
                    steering response is a necessity. Also, having to overcome 
                    prior magnetization in an electromagnet can be a waste of 
                    energy if the current used to energize the coil is 
                    alternating back and forth (AC). The area within the 
                    hysteresis curve gives a rough estimate of the amount of 
                    this wasted energy.  Other times, magnetic hysteresis is a 
                    desirable thing. Such is the case when magnetic materials 
                    are used as a means of storing information (computer disks, 
                    audio and video tapes). In these applications, it is 
                    desirable to be able to magnetize a speck of iron oxide 
                    (ferrite) and rely on that material's retentivity to 
                    "remember" its last magnetized state. Another productive 
                    application for magnetic hysteresis is in filtering 
                    high-frequency electromagnetic "noise" (rapidly alternating 
                    surges of voltage) from signal wiring by running those wires 
                    through the middle of a ferrite ring. The energy consumed in 
                    overcoming the hysteresis of ferrite attenuates the strength 
                    of the "noise" signal. Interestingly enough, the hysteresis 
                    curve of ferrite is quite extreme:  
                      
                      
                      REVIEW: 
                      The permeability of a material changes 
                      with the amount of magnetic flux forced through it. 
                      The specific relationship of force to flux 
                      (field intensity H to flux density B) is graphed in a form 
                      called the normal magnetization curve. 
                      It is possible to apply so much magnetic 
                      field force to a ferromagnetic material that no more flux 
                      can be crammed into it. This condition is known as 
                      magnetic saturation. 
                      When the retentivity of a 
                      ferromagnetic substance interferes with its 
                      re-magnetization in the opposite direction, a condition 
                      known as hysteresis occurs.  |